The Side Effects of Vaccines - How High is the Risk?

Share
HTML-code
  • Published: 12 May 2019
  • Sources: sites.google.com/view/sources-vaccines

    Vaccines are one of our best tools to prevent dangerous diseases, but they come with side effects. So would it be safer not to vaccinate?

    This video has been supported by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

    If you are interested how much sponsorships influence our videos, we wrote about that in detail here: medium.com/@Kurzgesagt/kurzgesagt-sponsorships-on-youtube-3121a45b0fe9


    Support us on Patreon so we can make more videos (and get cool stuff in return): patreon.com/Kurzgesagt?ty=h

    Kurzgesagt Newsletter: eepurl.com/cRUQxz
    Kurzgesagt Merch:  bit.ly/2GeuQxZ
    Facebook: bit.ly/1NB6U5O
    Twitter: bit.ly/2DDeT83
    Instagram: bit.ly/2DEN7r3
    Discord:
    discordapp.com/invite/GTFf4Tq

    The music of the video here:
    Soundcloud: bit.ly/2DZO6kr
    Bandcamp: bit.ly/2VXep55
    Youtube: bit.ly/2CZ6PeN
    Facebook: bit.ly/2qW6bY4

    THANKS A LOT TO OUR LOVELY PATRONS FOR SUPPORTING US:Marsha Sohn, Henri Holler, Michelle, Dan Crowley, Alex Hackman, Sammy Mikhael, Marcus Thorén, Kevin Harris, Jayami, Andreas Poletti, David Coates, Omar Galvis, Denny Zavada, Don Knowlton, Sebastian, Jay Ruthnam, Shakira Graham, MatBu, Mikhail, Sinan Taifour, Knowledge Unlimited, Odilia Krause, Anri Digholm, Dominykas, James Gaglio, Alice Jones, Narciso Jaramillo, Qaalid Hashi, Nate Bender, Gulyás Gergely, Michael Bloch, Rick Merced, Etienne Huguenot, Jonathan Lopez, Kai Smith, Benjamin Arndt, Philip Potvin, Amy Halter, Dylan polin, Zach Evans, Karan Chawla, Michael Casey, Francis Bouchard, William Gu, peck neck, Dien Buwono, Patrick Pruitt, Alexander Isayenko, Connor Doherty, Kierr Suñega, Kongpak Phupa, Lewis Foret, Daniel Ingegneri, David Saitta, Soeren Pollerhof, Ravi Shankar, Nico Kooyman, Anna Liceva, Dan Long, ADAM M., Cruz Godar, Pedro Caetano, Jean-Pierre Girard, Jonathan Piedrasanta, Jak SP, Jim Renney, Danielle Mitchell, Giorgio Valli, Ben Evans, Bill Cohen, Gitle Mikkelsen, Gemini00, Benjamin Mahoney, Christopher DiBattista, Mandy Reid, Gary Reckard, Sataporn Chaochonpun, Bigolf, Moses Malone, Kyle Merryman, Dante Bencivenga, Zeus Laser, Jake Wise, Jade, Fontaine Liu, Manav parmar, ethnicolor

    Help us caption & translate this video!youtube.com/timedtext_cs_panel?c=UCsXVk37bltHxD1rDPwtNM8Q&tab=2

Comments • 66 029

  • Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell

    Dive into sources and further reading here: https://sites.google.com/view/sources-vaccines


    Vaccines and their side effects are a hard topic to cover – we know we keep saying this, but this case especially, there were a lot of things to consider. You can’t blame people for being worried, so we wanted to take their concerns seriously.


    Because it is impossible to cover everything there is to know about vaccines in a ten minute video our sources are extra extensive and explain a lot of aspects in more detail, with an extra focus on further reading.


    So if you want to dive in deeper or have more arguments at hand for your next heated discussion, here you go.

    • jsmyth024
      jsmyth024  1 days back

      I'm sorry, but we are the sickest species ON THE PLANET. Just think about that for ONE minute.
      Our gut microbiome is being sterilized by pesticides like round up, and we are told they are safe(yes, they kill the bacteria in your gut - shocker), but DON'T WORRY, they have something you can buy for that.

      We are developing autoimmune diseases left and right. A study was just released that shows how millennials health plummets at around age 27, and no one is concerned that it's something to do with out healthcare? "healthcare" - that's a misnomer at this point.

      The SAME people that push round-up as being safe(now proven to cause cancer in a court of law), "provide" us with cancer treatments and vaccines.

      The same people who sell us vaccines, treat our children of these chronic illnesses. NO ONE is brave enough(or intelligent enough) to raise an eyebrow to that?

      Oh, wait, they are, but then they are told they are just crazy conspiracy theorists who are probably literally hitler and voted for trump. And people fall for it because it makes them FEEL safe. Meanwhile over FIFTY PERCENT of our youth(YOUTH!) have chronic illnesses that the AMA says they will NEVER recover from. And it's not enough for these mega corps to make millions or billions, now they are pushing for trillions.

      That's not fishy to you guys?

      I swear, people have thrown common sense directly out of the nearest window for, "double blind published data" We will NEVER get it. There are too many variables involved and you know this, that's why you keep asking.

      Honestly it makes me sick and people who are working for them should be ashamed of themselves. They aren't, because they have money in the bank, but one day, people are going to have had enough and they will be found and prosecuted.

      How many more of our loved ones have to suffer and die before it gets to that point?

    • frick ajit pai
      frick ajit pai  3 days back

      Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell epic

    • joel marin
      joel marin  3 days back

      thank you for making this video, its been a great help for my social justice project. I hope to use this as a source to help write my letter to a politician, (who is undecided as of writing this), I really hope to make a change and to make vaccinations more mandatory in the united states!

    • Jarley
      Jarley  2 weeks back

      Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell you forgot one thing that vaccines cause:




      adult hood
      I don’t want that happening to my children

  • Leo Raykher
    Leo Raykher  31 minutes back

    is it possible to be patriotic for your own body cuz thats what I was feeling at the beginning of the video lmao

    • Plinkplink Fizz
      Plinkplink Fizz  32 minutes back

      Brilliant! Show me an anti vaccination supporter and I will show you an idiot.

      • Ese Callum
        Ese Callum  56 minutes back

        Remember: Vaccines can cause serious health problems including brain inflammation and autoimmune disorders, allergies, ear infections, and more There's a very real association between vaccine complications and learning and behavioral disorders in children The components of vaccines have never been proven safe The ingredients and contaminants in vaccines can be detrimental to your health There are far safer and more effective ways to protect your children and yourself against disease. For example, a Japanese study from last year showed that school children taking vitamin D3 supplements were 58 percent less likely to catch influenza A. That's a higher effectiveness than any flu vaccine can claim, and doesn't come with a barrage of potentially devastating side effects!

        • ChaosLord
          ChaosLord  1 hours back

          Another great video on an important topic, but I think it fell short on the most important point to make to anti-vaxxers: vaccines and Autism. Yes, you said they don't cause Autism, but there's no explanation for why people think that. Mainly, the similar age between when Autism can be diagnosed and when vaccines are given, but this correlation is not causation. Both vaccines and diagnosing Autism happen around the same age for completely separate but specific reasons, which are not at all related to each other. THAT is the information anti-vaxxers need to hear.

          • Bradley Bridge
            Bradley Bridge  2 hours back

            Anti vaccination humans

            • Exotixz
              Exotixz  2 hours back

              Vaccinations aren't inherently bad. The MMR vaccines, however, are bad, since they're given to children at 4 months of age. Not only that, they'll give you 14 or so of them in one session.

              • Lucifronz
                Lucifronz  3 hours back

                All these many thousand years of scientific advancements to reach vaccines and now we have to defend them from people afraid their child might develop high-functioning autism or get "poisoned".


                I so wish they would actually listen to reason and take in the information from videos and sources like this... but the truth is I doubt any of them would listen no matter how calmly or rationally you tried to convince them. In their minds, they are right and you are just an ignorant fool for trying to explain otherwise. Hence, I lose my temper and tell them what I really think of them.


                I don't feel it makes a difference either way. They are set in their ways and only the deaths of their children (and themselves) will show them otherwise. I will not feel sorry for them, because by then they'll have killed many unvaccinated people who could not get the treatment that others could for one reason or another.


                Vaccines save lives. If can't see that, you just don't want to and I do not respect you for that. No one should.

                • Lucifronz
                  Lucifronz  2 hours back

                  +A Gamer I hate them, but I don't know if I'd go that far. Maybe hit them over the head for a mild concussion.


                  But frankly, I wouldn't feel bad to hear about it. They are causing serious harm to both scientific progress and putting tons of children at risk. Not even just children, but people with compromised or otherwise ineffective immune systems. I swear, if even one person I care about comes CLOSE to someone with a preventable disease because of these people, I might have to be restrained to not pull out a gun myself.

                • A Gamer
                  A Gamer  2 hours back

                  Lucifronz imo doctors should be given guns and allowed to kill antivaxxers on the spot

              • Ixion Music
                Ixion Music  3 hours back

                Stop feeding your kids! They could choke!

                -Karen 2019

                • A Gamer
                  A Gamer  2 hours back

                  Ixion Music stop breathing! you could die!

              • Antecomneno
                Antecomneno  3 hours back

                7.4k dislikes.
                We can safely assume those are anti-vaxxers.
                Only, none of them are posting any comments here.
                I guess that says a lot. I bet you tards are reading this, too.

                • Jayden Yeo
                  Jayden Yeo  55 minutes back

                  Antecomneno that or people didn’t watch the video, just saw the title, saw it as pro Antivax and immediately disliked it lol

              • 73Broadcast By 73 Brands

                My nanny (Grandma) grew up in the era where there was NO VACCINES. She contracted EVERYTHING. She survived the measles, chickenpox, & mumps. Other people, sadly, didn't. The only reasons people shouldn't get vaccinated is that 1. If you or your child are allergic. 2. If you have a severe medical condition (Cancer, HIV/AIDS, etc.). Or 3. If you are too old or too young to get vaccinated. If you are healthy, not allergic, and at the right age range, you SHOULD get vaccinated. The pros of vaccines will always outweigh the cons. As for my nanny, she's alive and well at the age of 82.

                • Whirlwind12 GMD
                  Whirlwind12 GMD  3 hours back

                  73Broadcast By 73 Brands prepared for every karen to read the first sentence and be like PROOF

              • GregThe Gengar
                GregThe Gengar  4 hours back

                I wanna bet $600 that all the dislikes on tgis video are anti-vaxxers

                • Whirlwind12 GMD
                  Whirlwind12 GMD  3 hours back

                  GregThe Gengar *dislikes video amd isnt antivaxx*
                  pay

              • D- train
                D- train  5 hours back

                The main stream people are eating this Bull Shit up, stop watching TV stop going to main stream school stop paying TAXES stop the illusion that OIL is going to run out stop funding the INTERNATIONAL BANKERS stop believing everything you are told. O ya BIG PHARMA KILLS 100,000,000 people every year.

                • Jayden Yeo
                  Jayden Yeo  54 minutes back

                  D- train where did you even get those numbers? Lmao

                • Lenni Mankki
                  Lenni Mankki  3 hours back

                  Yes this is a very good example of trust issues.

                • Whirlwind12 GMD
                  Whirlwind12 GMD  3 hours back

                  D- train No proof of what you just said.

                • Lenni Mankki
                  Lenni Mankki  4 hours back

                  I wanted to see if people were saying this so i sorted by newest and i saw this as the firs comment. lel

                • Folioscope cartoons
                  Folioscope cartoons  4 hours back

                  100,000,000 people is 1 in 7000 people. So you are saying in 70 years a 100th of people on earth would be killed?

              • robolex turner
                robolex turner  5 hours back

                "feeling are often immune to facts"

                Yup that's how most of the political debates go aswell 😔

                • Zealord94
                  Zealord94  5 hours back

                  Vaccine cause disease in me,it's called aging. Great, now I've started to become old rather than died at young age

                  • Bat3p
                    Bat3p  6 hours back

                    All dislikes are antivaxxers

                    • Dorothy Isidro
                      Dorothy Isidro  7 hours back

                      Nobody:
                      Not even a single soul:
                      Kurgesagt: antimates a bird which looks like a cell (that little black bird ball)

                      • The World of Chachundar

                        Kurzgesagt is a real fan of pokémon

                        • Brinch
                          Brinch  7 hours back

                          I really don't believe Kurzgesagt made a clickbait title to lure in antivaxxers (even though that is a good thing). I think they're just being as honest and upfront about vaccines as they can be, so no one can see them as "one-sided", or "manipulative". They are acknowledging that there are risks.

                          • Jel Gamer
                            Jel Gamer  7 hours back

                            Every karen ever watching this video: "Well acorrding to this website, it's bad"

                            • A rare pepe
                              A rare pepe  7 hours back

                              Such mad lads




                              *thank you.*

                              • Ese Callum
                                Ese Callum  8 hours back

                                The appalling record of ‘Big Pharma’:
                                32.
                                Pharmaceutical companies have a terrible record of corporate crimes.
                                "A recent study from US Public Citizen found that, since 1991, there have been
                                239 legal
                                settlements, totali
                                ng $30.2 billion
                                in federal and state penalties, levied against US
                                pharmaceutical companies.
                                There’s a real laundry list
                                of crimes, but defrauding the
                                government, hiding drug safety informat
                                ion, and hawking drug
                                s for purposes beyond
                                which they are approved
                                are the main ones. Drug companies have pledged to change, signed
                                ‘corporate integrity agreements’ and indicated that they want to move on, promising a better
                                future. We can be hopeful, but we also have to be
                                realistic. Paying huge fines for illegal activity
                                is one thing, but will they be
                                still playing the eminence game? W
                                ill they continue to fund their
                                own experts and do research that goes through a selective reporting of ‘the evidence’? Sadly,
                                that’s probably going to be the case so you must immunise yourself: keep asking questions and
                                questioning answers." (10)
                                33.
                                Recently Forbes magazine concluded that the pharmaceutical industry is ‘
                                addicted to
                                fraud’,
                                whilst
                                Merck is being sued by its own scientists
                                over a raft of frauds
                                relating to its
                                MMR vaccine
                                . (20) The list of alleged frauds is fa
                                r-ranging including failing to disclose a
                                reduced efficacy, using ‘improper testing techni
                                ques’, manipulation of testing methodologies,
                                falsifying test data, with holding data, and forgery of compliance documents. This kind of
                                behavior has become entirely common in the pharmaceutical industry.
                                Issues with risk minimization:
                                34.
                                Correct risk minimization approaches are often inverted, with consumers and
                                independent researchers expected to definitively prove harm, rather than the onus being on the
                                product provider to firmly establish safety. The ‘P
                                recautionary Principle’ – ‘if in doubt leave it
                                out’ – has been largely bypassed, and the terms of reference inverted.
                                35.
                                Pharmaceutical companies have positioned themselves so that policy makers often feel
                                constricted in holding them to the same levels of risk minimization as other industries, due to the
                                perception that they may forego important research, or cease delivering other effective products
                                if their operations are subjected to
                                greater scrutiny and bureaucracy.
                                36.
                                Negative effects of pharmaceutical products are often diffused in the wider community,
                                and not always easy to quantify due to inadequate reportage and monitoring. Unlike an airline
                                disaster which has a very immediate consequence, the negative effects of a particular
                                pharmaceutical product may be less discernable,
                                especially if the effects are more long term.
                                37.
                                Most people would agree that if a disease usually has a very low mortality rate, any
                                vaccine intended to prevent it must be unequivo
                                cally safe and effective. Proper risk assessments
                                are made difficult by the lack of robust monitoring of adverse events; the suppression of
                                independent science, the with holding of clinical data, and myriad other issues mentioned in this
                                paper.
                                38.
                                No scientific research has been conducted comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated
                                populations, in terms of overall,
                                long term health outcomes.
                                Call for reform and greater transparency:
                                39.
                                The dealings of the pharmaceutical industry in Australia appear to be largely exempt
                                from Freedom of Information requests, and there is a lack of transparency surrounding possible
                                Conflict of Interest situations on advisory bodies. Dr Whitely has also called for mandatory
                                reporting of serious adverse events, and break ou
                                t boxes on products warning of possible serious
                                side effects. (4)
                                40.
                                So far calls to bring the industry in line with
                                the expectations of other industries have
                                been largely ignored.
                                Issues with the applicatio
                                n of ‘informed consent’:
                                41.
                                The principle of ‘informed consent’ requires that patients be informed of all risks and
                                benefits associated with any medical procedure, and that a decision be made free from coercion.
                                In an environment where pharmaceutical marketing, the media, and various ‘attack ‘ groups
                                hystericise the general population and vilify critics and independent researchers, the notion of
                                ‘informed consent’ has become problematic. Consumers clearly feel pressurized.
                                42.
                                Linking the decision to vaccinate to the provision of childcare available to everyone else,
                                further complicates this. It can be argued that such
                                policy enters a grey area in terms of informed
                                consent.
                                43.
                                Vaccination providers also seem reluctant to provide consumers with information on
                                possible adverse effects. Many maintain the narrative that vaccines are ‘safe and effective’ in all
                                instances, despite package inserts clearly outlining possible adverse effects. An audit of how
                                vaccination providers approach ‘informed consent’ is urgently needed.
                                Unresolved liability issues:
                                44.
                                As the parents of Saba Button - who was permanently injured by a flu shot - found there
                                is a lack of clarity when it comes to liability.
                                (15) Australia is one of only three Western nations
                                that does not have a vaccine injury compensation scheme despite the World Health Organisation
                                arguing it is an ‘ethical necessity’. In the case of an injury there is no clear indication of who
                                takes responsibility.
                                45.
                                If the parents of a vaccine injured child feel their decision to vaccinate was prompted by
                                government policy, does the government take responsibility if their child is injured as a result? It
                                would appear not. Pharmaceutical companies and vaccination providers also seem to avoid
                                liability. This question requires immediate clar
                                ification. Currently there is a policy void
                                surrounding issues of lia
                                bility and compensation.

                                • Callum Ferns
                                  Callum Ferns  56 minutes back

                                  +Ese Callum nobody fuckin cares because we got vaccinated and don't have autism unlike you bitch

                                • Ese Callum
                                  Ese Callum  3 hours back

                                  +Red Phoenix The appalling record of ‘Big Pharma’:
                                  32.
                                  Pharmaceutical companies have a terrible record of corporate crimes.
                                  "A recent study from US Public Citizen found that, since 1991, there have been
                                  239 legal
                                  settlements, totali
                                  ng $30.2 billion
                                  in federal and state penalties, levied against US
                                  pharmaceutical companies.
                                  There’s a real laundry list
                                  of crimes, but defrauding the
                                  government, hiding drug safety informat
                                  ion, and hawking drug
                                  s for purposes beyond
                                  which they are approved
                                  are the main ones. Drug companies have pledged to change, signed
                                  ‘corporate integrity agreements’ and indicated that they want to move on, promising a better
                                  future. We can be hopeful, but we also have to be
                                  realistic. Paying huge fines for illegal activity
                                  is one thing, but will they be
                                  still playing the eminence game? W
                                  ill they continue to fund their
                                  own experts and do research that goes through a selective reporting of ‘the evidence’? Sadly,
                                  that’s probably going to be the case so you must immunise yourself: keep asking questions and
                                  questioning answers." (10)
                                  33.
                                  Recently Forbes magazine concluded that the pharmaceutical industry is ‘
                                  addicted to
                                  fraud’,
                                  whilst
                                  Merck is being sued by its own scientists
                                  over a raft of frauds
                                  relating to its
                                  MMR vaccine
                                  . (20) The list of alleged frauds is fa
                                  r-ranging including failing to disclose a
                                  reduced efficacy, using ‘improper testing techni
                                  ques’, manipulation of testing methodologies,
                                  falsifying test data, with holding data, and forgery of compliance documents. This kind of
                                  behavior has become entirely common in the pharmaceutical industry.
                                  Issues with risk minimization:
                                  34.
                                  Correct risk minimization approaches are often inverted, with consumers and
                                  independent researchers expected to definitively prove harm, rather than the onus being on the
                                  product provider to firmly establish safety. The ‘P
                                  recautionary Principle’ – ‘if in doubt leave it
                                  out’ – has been largely bypassed, and the terms of reference inverted.
                                  35.
                                  Pharmaceutical companies have positioned themselves so that policy makers often feel
                                  constricted in holding them to the same levels of risk minimization as other industries, due to the
                                  perception that they may forego important research, or cease delivering other effective products
                                  if their operations are subjected to
                                  greater scrutiny and bureaucracy.
                                  36.
                                  Negative effects of pharmaceutical products are often diffused in the wider community,
                                  and not always easy to quantify due to inadequate reportage and monitoring. Unlike an airline
                                  disaster which has a very immediate consequence, the negative effects of a particular
                                  pharmaceutical product may be less discernable,
                                  especially if the effects are more long term.
                                  37.
                                  Most people would agree that if a disease usually has a very low mortality rate, any
                                  vaccine intended to prevent it must be unequivo
                                  cally safe and effective. Proper risk assessments
                                  are made difficult by the lack of robust monitoring of adverse events; the suppression of
                                  independent science, the with holding of clinical data, and myriad other issues mentioned in this
                                  paper.
                                  38.
                                  No scientific research has been conducted comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated
                                  populations, in terms of overall,
                                  long term health outcomes.
                                  Call for reform and greater transparency:
                                  39.
                                  The dealings of the pharmaceutical industry in Australia appear to be largely exempt
                                  from Freedom of Information requests, and there is a lack of transparency surrounding possible
                                  Conflict of Interest situations on advisory bodies. Dr Whitely has also called for mandatory
                                  reporting of serious adverse events, and break ou
                                  t boxes on products warning of possible serious
                                  side effects. (4)
                                  40.
                                  So far calls to bring the industry in line with
                                  the expectations of other industries have
                                  been largely ignored.
                                  Issues with the applicatio
                                  n of ‘informed consent’:
                                  41.
                                  The principle of ‘informed consent’ requires that patients be informed of all risks and
                                  benefits associated with any medical procedure, and that a decision be made free from coercion.
                                  In an environment where pharmaceutical marketing, the media, and various ‘attack ‘ groups
                                  hystericise the general population and vilify critics and independent researchers, the notion of
                                  ‘informed consent’ has become problematic. Consumers clearly feel pressurized.
                                  42.
                                  Linking the decision to vaccinate to the provision of childcare available to everyone else,
                                  further complicates this. It can be argued that such
                                  policy enters a grey area in terms of informed
                                  consent.
                                  43.
                                  Vaccination providers also seem reluctant to provide consumers with information on
                                  possible adverse effects. Many maintain the narrative that vaccines are ‘safe and effective’ in all
                                  instances, despite package inserts clearly outlining possible adverse effects. An audit of how
                                  vaccination providers approach ‘informed consent’ is urgently needed.
                                  Unresolved liability issues:
                                  44.
                                  As the parents of Saba Button - who was permanently injured by a flu shot - found there
                                  is a lack of clarity when it comes to liability.
                                  (15) Australia is one of only three Western nations
                                  that does not have a vaccine injury compensation scheme despite the World Health Organisation
                                  arguing it is an ‘ethical necessity’. In the case of an injury there is no clear indication of who
                                  takes responsibility.
                                  45.
                                  If the parents of a vaccine injured child feel their decision to vaccinate was prompted by
                                  government policy, does the government take responsibility if their child is injured as a result? It
                                  would appear not. Pharmaceutical companies and vaccination providers also seem to avoid
                                  liability. This question requires immediate clar
                                  ification. Currently there is a policy void
                                  surrounding issues of lia
                                  bility and compensation.

                                • Ese Callum
                                  Ese Callum  3 hours back

                                  +Red Phoenix i suggest you shut up and do that and get the 241 vaccinations big pharma want you to take.

                                • Red Phoenix
                                  Red Phoenix  3 hours back

                                  just shut up and get vaccinated.

                              • Ese Callum
                                Ese Callum  8 hours back

                                g.
                                Mobilizing patient and consumer gr
                                oups to represent their interests.
                                h.
                                Manipulating a compliant media, which is at times compromised by conflicts of interest,
                                especially at an executive level where a cross
                                pollination occurs with ph
                                armaceutical interests
                                occurs.(16) They also exploit the quick turnaround in the media which can mitigate against in
                                depth research.
                                i.
                                Lobbying policy makers and opinion leaders.
                                j.
                                Selective use of statistics. For example globa
                                l statistics on disease mortality are often
                                used to panic policy makers in Western nations.
                                Issues with nutrition, hygiene and so forth in
                                some ‘third world’ nations may play a significan
                                t role in mortality figures for diseases which
                                have low mortality in robust individuals in Western nations.
                                k.
                                An ‘all of nothing’ approach that lumps all vaccine /disease combinations together, and
                                leverages the most extreme disease threats to compel compliance with a vaccine based approach
                                to those with low mortality. The ‘pro/anti’ dual
                                ism is also used to sideline and discredit anyone
                                who presents critical research of a particular product.
                                30.
                                Aside from pharmaceutical marketing there is a more complex and less easily understood
                                phenomenon involving groups and individuals that present themselves as being pro ‘science’ or
                                more specifically pro vaccination. They often ta
                                ke it upon themselves to run campaigns against
                                individuals or groups that they perceive as bein
                                g critical of vaccination. Their tactics can be
                                crude but effective, and at times of questionable legality. They can include:
                                a.
                                Cyber bullying and threats.
                                b.
                                Disinformation campaigns including misrepresenting research.
                                c.
                                Making spurious complain
                                ts to academic institution
                                s and professional bodies.
                                d.
                                Disseminating fictitious personal information designed to cause embarrassment or a loss
                                of credibility.
                                e.
                                Using seemingly authoritative or popular
                                websites to launch attacks designed to
                                hystericise consumers, and ostracize critics. In some instances the wording can be considered
                                ‘hate speech’ and adds to an atmosphere of fear surrounding this issue.
                                27.
                                One of the world’s most awarded journalists Sharyl Atkisson describes this as the ‘astro
                                turf’ movement. She has researched the tactics used by pharmaceutical concerns and their allies
                                to silence the very many researchers from eminent Universities who are critical of their products.
                                “.....if the propagandists are to be believed, each of the researchers is an incompetent crank,
                                quack, nut or fraud (and, of course, “anti-vaccin
                                e” for daring to dabble in research that........
                                leads to vaccine safety
                                issues). The scientists and their re
                                search are “controversial,” simply
                                because the propagandists declare them to be........“Weak,” “too small,” “haphazard,” “not
                                replicated,” “junk science,” “flawed,” “unrelated,” declare the propagandists, without exception.
                                Just as attackers spent years challenging any study that linked tobacco to lung cancer.
                                They know that
                                reporters who don’t do their homework
                                will conduct an Internet search, run
                                across the blogs with science-y sounding names, and
                                uncritically accept their word as if it’s
                                fact
                                and prevailing thought.” (17)
                                31.
                                Pharmaceutical marketing leverages off a kind of religious fervor that surrounds this
                                issue. Dr Jefferson has said that ‘
                                vaccines have become like a religion
                                ... something you don’t
                                question. If you do, you are seen as being an anti-vaccine extremist. The authorities do not want
                                to hear ‘side-effect’(18)

                                • Ese Callum
                                  Ese Callum  8 hours back

                                  Correlative studies:
                                  22
                                  Correlative studies cannot be considered definitive, but in conjunction with other research
                                  they often indicate areas that require further examination. There has so far not been an
                                  exhaustive and independent study comparing more general health outcomes between vaccinated
                                  and non vaccinated children. Can we definitively
                                  say we are not trading one health issue for
                                  another?
                                  23.
                                  A report in ‘Human and Experimental Toxicology’ stated:
                                  "Our findings show
                                  a positive correlation
                                  between the
                                  number of vaccine doses
                                  administered
                                  and the
                                  percentage of hospitalisations and deaths
                                  "? (12)
                                  24.
                                  And, "the US childhood vaccination schedule has 26 doses for infants aged less than 1
                                  year, the most in the world, yet 33 nations have better Infant Mortality Rates......
                                  Nations that
                                  require more vaccine doses tend to ha
                                  ve higher infant mortality rates
                                  "(13)
                                  25.
                                  A Spanish research team concluded that, “vaccines containing adjuvants may be
                                  associated with an
                                  increased risk of autoimmune/inflammatory adverse events
                                  following
                                  immunization”(14)
                                  Regulation and monitoring:
                                  26.
                                  In a submission to parliament Dr Martin Whitely, senior advocate for the Western
                                  Australian Health Consumers Council stated:
                                  “When licensing drugs for marketing Australia
                                  ’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)
                                  relies on research funded and controlled by pharmaceutical companies. Too often pharmaceutical
                                  companies ‘
                                  cherry pick’ favorable evidence and hide or ‘spin’ unfavorable evidence
                                  to
                                  support their commercial interests.” (4)
                                  27.
                                  Most vaccination proponents will argue that
                                  serious adverse reactions are rare, but a big
                                  problem is that we do not have accurate, agreed upon figures. During the height of the flu
                                  vaccine adverse reactions in 2010 Peter Collignon, a professor of infectious diseases from the
                                  Australian National University, was
                                  interviewed by ABC news. He felt
                                  the number of adverse
                                  reactions was probably under estimated
                                  , given that authorities don’t have a congruent and
                                  approachable system to monitor peoples’ reactions. He believed that an effective surveillance
                                  system should monitor a sample group of thousands for one or two weeks before a new vaccine
                                  is rolled out for the entire population. "We need a better system than voluntary notification to the
                                  TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) that there's a problem," he said. "Because whenever
                                  you do that you really underestimate how much of a problem there is. (15)
                                  28.
                                  Dr. Whitely has argued that there needs to be mandatory reporting of adverse events. (4)
                                  Without agreed upon figures for adverse events an accurate risk analysis cannot be undertaken,
                                  and we are unable to state whether the current schedule of vaccinations is in fact safe, or creating
                                  more negative health outcomes than
                                  it is intended to prevent.
                                  Tactics used by pharmaceutical
                                  companies to silence dissent:
                                  29.
                                  “Pharmaceutical companies are master manipulators.....”, Dr Whitely has stated. “They
                                  pull the wool over the eyes of drug safety regulators everywhere”. (4) They use a range of tactics
                                  which can include:
                                  a.
                                  Controlling the medical evidence base via influencing clinical trial guidelines; ‘ghost
                                  writing’ articles for journals; selectively releasin
                                  g data, and selectively marketing trial results.
                                  b.
                                  Utilizing ‘Key Opinion Leaders’ who often have undue influence upon policy – a
                                  problem the independent Cochrane Collaboration refers to as ‘Eminence Based Medicine’.(10)
                                  c.
                                  Maintaining a barrage of websites and blogs that purport to support ‘science’, but embed
                                  their marketing objectives.
                                  d.
                                  Embedding their marketing in established news and information websites.
                                  e.
                                  Undertaking virulent campaigns to discredit researchers who question their products.
                                  Terms such as ‘junk science’, ‘questionable’, ‘not
                                  evidence based’, and many more are routinely
                                  used in attempts to discredit researchers who threaten their profit margins.
                                  f.
                                  Maintaining a small army of internet trolls to present the interests of pharmaceutical
                                  companies in online discussion forums, the comments sections of articles, and any other area
                                  where they can present their views.

                                  • Ese Callum
                                    Ese Callum  8 hours back

                                    19.
                                    If you bought a new car and there was only a one in twelve chance that it would work
                                    properly, how would you feel? And what if there was a one in three chance that it was downright
                                    dangerous? Faced by these sorts of statistics, most consumers would be furious. And yet
                                    according to an article in the ‘Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics’, entitled ‘Institutional
                                    Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs’ this may well be the
                                    state of affairs with pharmaceutical products.. The
                                    “.....proportion of new products with
                                    clinical advantages seems to have moved from about 1 in 8 down to 1 in 12, while the
                                    proportion with serious harms has gone up from 1 in 5 towards 1 in 3
                                    ......" (9)
                                    20.
                                    Dr Tom Jefferson of the independent Cochrane Collaboration has undertaken
                                    comprehensive reviews of some vaccines. According to his findings the ‘flu vaccine for example
                                    showed “
                                    no effect on specific outcomes:
                                    laboratory-proven influenza, pneumonia, or deaths
                                    from pneumonia”. .In other words, the flu vaccine policy, ‘while eminently agreeable, is
                                    unsupported by evidence that has been systematically collected, critically evaluated, and
                                    properly synthesised.’ He is wary of the ‘trust us, we’re experts’ pose taken by many policy
                                    makers. He states that ‘in my opinion,
                                    that response is only fit for underlings, not intelligent,
                                    responsible healthcare workers facing th
                                    e pointy end of a syringe this season
                                    . (10)
                                    21.
                                    It is also worth pondering the words of immunologist Dr Tetyana Obukhanych, author of
                                    ‘Vaccine Illusion’
                                    “I am very concerned that “immunologic memory” of adjuvant-containing vaccines is actually
                                    the basis of sensitization rather
                                    than the basis of immunity.
                                    Furthermore, I am very concerned that “successful” prevention of childhood diseases by means
                                    of short-term protective effects of live attenuated viral vaccines during childhood has led to the
                                    loss of maternal ability to transfer immuno-protection to their young, thereby leaving infants
                                    vulnerable to those diseases, should the exposure occur.
                                    I am also very concerned that vaccination campaigns work by disrupting disease transmission,
                                    which reduces the chances of exposure, rather than by establishing a population’s immunity. By
                                    doing so,
                                    vaccination campaigns wipe out populati
                                    on’s immunity to childhood diseases
                                    rather than help to maintain it.
                                    If in prior decades there was naturally established herd
                                    immunity to childhood diseases among the adult po
                                    pulation, then I am af
                                    raid that vaccination
                                    campaigns have ensured that it is long gone.
                                    All of this is a direct outcome of the “desired” vaccination effects, the impact of which hasn’t
                                    been carefully thought through in advance of introducing mass vaccination.
                                    We thought that
                                    vaccines work just like natural immunity. We
                                    ll, apparently they
                                    don’t and we are now
                                    reaping the consequences of that.”
                                    (11)

                                    • 9 year old soldier
                                      9 year old soldier  8 hours back

                                      Anti-vax kids:*Turns 3*
                                      Anti-vax parents:*Grabs coffin* get the fu*k in here

                                      • Ese Callum
                                        Ese Callum  8 hours back

                                        2.
                                        Dozens of academic papers and media articles have been reviewed and inputs received
                                        from immunologists, geneticists, epidemiologists, and various other medical professionals, as
                                        well as government officials, journalists, risk minimization experts and ethicists globally and
                                        locally. A large amount of supporting information can be supplied if required.
                                        Overview:
                                        3.
                                        This paper will look at how the medical ev
                                        idence base has been almost completely
                                        compromised by pharmaceutical marketing concer
                                        ns; how the selective release of data skews
                                        results, and how this is used to mislead policy makers, the medical community and the general
                                        public.
                                        4.
                                        It will look at evidence th
                                        at some vaccine products and ingredients are implicated in
                                        neurological harm, autoimmune dysfunction, and other negative health outcomes.
                                        5.
                                        It will present a case that the Australian m
                                        odel of regulation and monitoring is far from
                                        adequate, and issues of liab
                                        ility have been largely overlooked. Correct risk minimization
                                        processes have been inverted, and a lack of transparency has been identified in key areas.
                                        6.
                                        It will also look at the media bias surroundi
                                        ng this issue, and the techniques used by
                                        pharmaceutical marketing and its allies to suppre
                                        ss independent journalism and science. It will
                                        touch upon the appalling record of pharmaceutical companies which includes many instances of
                                        fraud, bribery, intimidation and deliberate negligence.
                                        7.
                                        This paper is not intended to be in any way definitive, but it is meant to give a brief
                                        overview of the case for policy change, and an urgent review of how pharmaceutical interests
                                        operate in this country.
                                        Contamination of the medical evidence base:
                                        8.
                                        In 2002 the editor of the Lancet, Dr Richard Horton, claimed that around 90% of clinical
                                        guidelines are being written by people with financial links to pharmaceutical companies. Since
                                        then it has been revealed that articles in
                                        medical journals are being ‘ghost written’ by
                                        pharmaceutical employees, and that data is being routinely with held.
                                        "Horton declared, “
                                        Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue
                                        .
                                        Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and
                                        flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of
                                        dubious importance,
                                        science has taken a turn towards darkness
                                        .” (1)
                                        9.
                                        The work of Dr Peter Doshi and the independent Cochrane Collaboration should give us
                                        pause for thought.
                                        “The current system....... is one in which the me
                                        ager details of clinical trials published in
                                        medical journals, often by authors with financial ties to the companies whose drugs they are
                                        writing about,
                                        is insufficient to the point of being misleading
                                        ”.(2)
                                        10.
                                        The industry has not been slow to respond.
                                        "The pharmaceutical industry has "mobilised" an army of patient groups to lobby against plans to
                                        force companies to publish secret documents on drugs trials.
                                        Drug companies publish only a
                                        fraction of their results
                                        and keep much of the information to
                                        themselves, but regulators want to ban the practice. If companies published all of their clinical
                                        trials data, independent scientists could re analyse their results and check companies' claims
                                        about the safety and efficacy of drugs." (3)
                                        11.
                                        The much vaunted medical evidence base is in a bad state of disrepair. As Dr Marcia
                                        Angell, a former editor for the New England Journal of Medicine states,
                                        "
                                        It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published,
                                        or
                                        to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no
                                        pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an
                                        editor of The New England Journal of Medicine. "(4)
                                        Adverse events following vaccination:
                                        12.
                                        Vaccine manufacturers acknowledge a range of adverse reactions in their product
                                        disclosure information, and there are over forty acknowledged vaccine induced adverse events.
                                        (5) There is no doubt that vaccines can cause harm, and even death, in some instances. So
                                        regardless of what anyone may make of individual research papers the fact is that there is
                                        agreement that vaccination is never entirely safe. There can be risks involved. And efficacy rates
                                        vary.
                                        13.
                                        There are a large amount of research papers discussing possible harm from vaccines
                                        and/or specific ingredients. The senior post doctoral researchers in vaccine safety at the
                                        University of British Columbia Professor Chris Sh
                                        aw and Dr Lucija Tomijanovic have presented
                                        many papers on the deleterious effects of vaccine adjuvants. They have investigated the
                                        mechanisms of aluminium based adjuvants in paed
                                        iatric populations and concluded that children
                                        have an immune system that is a work in progress, and is far more susceptible to harmful side
                                        effects. Their
                                        ‘observations raise plausible concerns about the overall safety of current
                                        childhood vaccination programs.’
                                        (6)
                                        14.
                                        “Infants and young children should not be viewed as ‘‘small adults.’’ Their unique
                                        physiology makes them much more vulnerab
                                        le to noxious environmental insults in
                                        comparison with the adult population.
                                        In spite of this, children are routinely exposed to much
                                        higher levels of Al vaccine adjuvants th
                                        an adults, even though adequate safety
                                        data on these compounds are lacking.
                                        That Al vaccine adjuvants can induce significant
                                        autoimmune conditions in humans
                                        can hardly be disputed, a
                                        lthough still debatable is how
                                        common such side effects are. However, the existing data (or lack thereof) raise questions on
                                        whether the current vaccines aimed at pediatric populations can be accepted as having adequate
                                        safety profiles. Because infants and children represent those who may be most at risk for
                                        complications following vaccination,
                                        a more rigorous evaluation of potential vaccine-related
                                        adverse health impacts in pediatric populations
                                        than what has been provided to date is
                                        urgently needed.”
                                        (6)
                                        15.
                                        Tomijanovic states, ‘
                                        Physicians should adopt a more rigorous evidence-based
                                        medicine
                                        approach,
                                        in order to provide a balanced and objective evaluation of vaccine risks and
                                        benefits to their patients’ (7)
                                        16.
                                        They also concluded that
                                        “.....in spite of the widespread agreement that vaccines
                                        are
                                        largely safe and serious adverse complications are extremely rare, a close scrutiny of the
                                        scientific literature does not support this view.”(
                                        6)
                                        17.
                                        Professor Yehuda Shoenfeld spoke in Australia in 2013. He has investigated how
                                        aluminum based adjuvants can trigger auto immune dysfunction if a genetic predisposition
                                        exists. There is widespread acceptance of his finding that
                                        aluminium adjuvants can cause
                                        catastrophic auto im
                                        mune dysfunction
                                        (8). He has identified key genetic markers indicative of
                                        a predisposition towards adverse events, and yet little work seems to be being done identifying
                                        individuals who may be at risk.
                                        18.
                                        Australia is currently experiencing what
                                        politician Bill Shorten described as an
                                        ‘epidemic’ of broad spectrum neurological dysfun
                                        ctions, so if there is the slightest possibility
                                        that Professor Shaw, Shoenfeld et al are correct, we need to be looking at what other countries
                                        are doing in this regard. In 2014 France held
                                        an open enquiry into the issue of aluminium
                                        adjuvants. So far Australia has avoided looking
                                        at this issue, or conducting any transparent
                                        enquiry into the side effects of vaccination.

                                      • jimmy jimster
                                        jimmy jimster  8 hours back

                                        if you take in consideration how if you dont take vaccines it could lead to alot more deaths than taking the vaccines

                                        • Melvin Yellow
                                          Melvin Yellow  9 hours back

                                          Not true, don’t listen. It’s a fact that autosm causes vaccines

                                          • Artemis420
                                            Artemis420  7 hours back

                                            Melvin Yellow 😂😂😂 I was about to get so mad

                                        • ABYSS WATCHERS
                                          ABYSS WATCHERS  9 hours back

                                          those anti vaxxers wont learn unless they have caused an outbreak that their beloved child is one of the casualties. well stupid people always learn it the hard way i guess.

                                          • A wild Spitfire
                                            A wild Spitfire  9 hours back

                                            I bet 3/4 views are from anti vaxxers

                                            • Dominik Mandic
                                              Dominik Mandic  9 hours back

                                              Things that never get old

                                              1.Dark Humor
                                              2.Complaining about school😫
                                              3.Unvaccined kids

                                              • Catte Official
                                                Catte Official  9 hours back

                                                I'm sorry. But you've gotten the disease called being alive.
                                                Like how do you people think that vaccines are bad?

                                                • panggop jio
                                                  panggop jio  10 hours back

                                                  got over the issue and can now be vaccinated.

                                                  • Artemis420
                                                    Artemis420  7 hours back

                                                    panggop jio good for you 🙏🏼💪🏼

                                                • TheManiac Gaming
                                                  TheManiac Gaming  12 hours back

                                                  Side effect: Small children start screaming that they don't want to get a shot and then they don't even know when they did it. XD

                                                  • Smitty Fan
                                                    Smitty Fan  13 hours back

                                                    I had to go to the ER due to a severe allergic reaction from getting immunized. My mom thinks it was probably the MMR one, in fact. Since then, she stopped immunizations, and interestingly, I have had fewer ear infections since then. Also, the time my dad decided to get a free flu shot at work, he got super sick with the flu for about two weeks afterward. I have a friend whose daughter died because she was given an accidental overdose on her immunizations. Immunizations are not perfect. Everyone's body is different and reacts differently. They work great for some, but not so great for others. People's genetics sometimes play a factor, even. The amount of required immunizations and drugs given to kids has increased over the years. Ironically, the number of kids with autism and other serious mental health issues and diseases have also increased over the years too. It does make one wonder...

                                                    • Vary Olla
                                                      Vary Olla  2 minutes back

                                                      Yet what you "believe" you know = does not reflect what is actually the case.  I would point you to a cognitive bias problem called Dunning-Krueger Effect.  So first of all if you live in the US - which your language skills identifies - then you need to understand that most vaccines come as "unit dose".  It has been that way for many years now. 

                                                      So a unit dose vaccine comes prefilled from the manufacturer so that the individual who administers is need only apply a sterile needle and give the shot = after which the syringe is disposed of.  So there is no drawing up a dose for almost all vaccines - and even if there were the amount given as noted once again is impossible to overdose on.

                                                      You seem to be applying what amounts to circular logic here.  You keep cycling through rationalizations to maintain what you want to believe = and those rationalizations reflect incorrect assumptions.  So this is what you need to understand.  The pathogens we vaccinate against = exist in nature and thus in human populations.  Accordingly you *ARE* at risk regardless of your attitude towards vaccines.  As such vaccines offer you exposure under controlled conditions to minimize the risk of serious adverse effects and even dying.  Were people to take their chances and not vaccinate then those infectious diseases would once again burn through the land infecting millions and killing innumerable people as herd immunity broke down = it's a matter of historical record.  We are seeing right now by the way in the US with the measles epidemic which is almost entirely among unvaccinated people. 

                                                      So are vaccines without risk - nope.  What they offer people is significantly reduced risk for things we are all at risk for anyways.  If a few dozen react badly to say the MMR vaccine over a period of a few years = we used to see thousands react the same to measles in the time before the MMR.   So pick your poison as the old saying goes.  Have a nice day.

                                                    • Smitty Fan
                                                      Smitty Fan  1 hours back

                                                      They're totally related. You haven't experienced what I have. I even mentioned to begin with, how they have helped some people. They don't work for everyone though. They're not a one size fix-all, cure-all. And yes, it's possible for doctors to give the wrong dosages of stuff. They aren't perfect, supreme beings incapable of error.

                                                    • Smitty Fan
                                                      Smitty Fan  1 hours back

                                                      I'm not using fake stories. Only what I know.

                                                    • Thomas Wadsworth
                                                      Thomas Wadsworth  7 hours back

                                                      +Smitty Fan your first answer almost sounded plausible but then this comment shows really you were using a fake story to push an agenda, because now your just throwing all this "fact" around to support something you clearly believe in rather than initially your just pondering based on lack of knowledge which is ok to do btw. Until it turns dangerous and you harm other people

                                                    • Vary Olla
                                                      Vary Olla  10 hours back

                                                      So rather than sticking to the facts = you simply go off on even more unrelated tangents which again do not reflect reality.  Who's a thunk it. 

                                                      1 - the daughter could have conceivably died from a variety of things.  Vaccine overdose is not among them as it is a nonexistent condition.
                                                      2 - it is sadly apparently you not only do not understand the ingredients of vaccines = you apparently lack even a rudimentary understanding of science in general and basic chemistry in particular.
                                                      3 - formaldehyde is a naturally occurring substance in the human body.  Your body produces it all the time as it is used as a precursor in a variety of metabolic functions to include DNA formation. In the human body it is rapidly broken down into formic acid which is then excreted via the kidneys.  So what makes it dangerous - and by the way commercial formaldehyde such as is used for embalming fluid contains a host of other chemicals beside formaldehyde - is if that formic acid accumulates in the body to dangerous levels.  In a child with normal renal functioning however that does not happen and thus a child will at any given time have 50-70X the level of naturally occurring formaldehyde in their body than the residual microscopic amounts that may be found in some vaccines.
                                                      4 - aluminum such as is Alum which is used for adjuvant is not the same as the aluminum found in your toaster = nonsensical equivalency.  It is not a "heavy metal" either.  The aluminum *SALT* that is used as adjuvant is the same as can be found in a myriad of foodstuffs and is an ingredient in baking powder.  It is a water-soluble analog of the Aluminum atom = and anyone who understands chemistry knows that an analog is chemically different and thus it metabolizes differently based upon it's chemical composition.  
                                                      5 - Aluminum is ubiquitous in human food being naturally occurring as it is one of the most common elements on the planet.  Plants absorb it from the soil as they take in nutrients = while animals eat the plants and humans eat both.  So the average person ingests - and absorbs - vastly more aluminum via their cumulative intake than they could conceivably be exposed to in a lifetime of vaccination.
                                                      6 - lastly the idiocy about mixing DNA.  Ever catch the Flu perchance??  H1N1 - or swine Flu - is called that because the strain originated in pigs.  Accordingly the virus contains both human and porcine DNA = which means anyone who catches it now has that swine DNA replicating in their body.  Any time you consume a natural foodstuff or protein = you are ingesting "foreign" DNA.  Eat a hamburger = bovine DNA.  Eat some fish = fish DNA. 

                                                      So I will leave you with this cautionary tale.  Wherever you are getting this pseudo-scientific nonsense from = find a new source of information as what you are posting here is frankly silly.  Have a nice day.

                                                  • kropotk1n
                                                    kropotk1n  14 hours back

                                                    Люди, кому интересно на моём канале есть русская озвучка этого видео

                                                    • Chime Rift
                                                      Chime Rift  6 hours back

                                                      Не русский, и я не говорю по - русски, но спасибо.
                                                      :-)

                                                  • Parry Home
                                                    Parry Home  14 hours back

                                                    My dad was vaccinated, his hair started greying, so bad he had to remove it and got a bad back! This is because he is old

                                                    • Sanhinda Peiris
                                                      Sanhinda Peiris  15 hours back

                                                      R.I.P dead kids

                                                      • Paskal Sitepu
                                                        Paskal Sitepu  15 hours back

                                                        * seeing 3:06 *
                                                        me: *extreme wheezing*

                                                        • Marco Pohl
                                                          Marco Pohl  16 hours back

                                                          "8% will get serious diarrhea" well shit!

                                                          • Potatoe Man96
                                                            Potatoe Man96  17 hours back

                                                            *karen stop playing the boss music he hears it*

                                                            • Intellectual Canine
                                                              Intellectual Canine  17 hours back

                                                              bruh if you get vaccinated you'd still die in 100 years 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

                                                              • Kaata Furgenduter
                                                                Kaata Furgenduter  15 hours back

                                                                +xealen dammit

                                                              • xealen
                                                                xealen  15 hours back

                                                                +Kaata Furgenduter its a joke

                                                              • Kaata Furgenduter
                                                                Kaata Furgenduter  17 hours back

                                                                I'm not sure if I'm getting r/wooshed or you're just a dumb antivaxxer.

                                                            • David Perry
                                                              David Perry  19 hours back

                                                              Oh yea I know all about this I watch Cells At Work, amazing Anime 👌🏾

                                                              • Joshua Dixon
                                                                Joshua Dixon  19 hours back

                                                                Oh no no no no don’t tell me your anti-vax

                                                                • Whirlwind12 GMD
                                                                  Whirlwind12 GMD  3 hours back

                                                                  Joshua Dixon it is clickbait to lire antivaxxers, chill

                                                              • Lorenza Semaj McCoy Jr.
                                                                Lorenza Semaj McCoy Jr.  19 hours back

                                                                Man the part starting at around 1:00 should be a RTS game lol!

                                                                • Thomas Keller
                                                                  Thomas Keller  20 hours back

                                                                  Thank yo for making this I hate anti vaxxers with the passion for murder and I think they are just too dumb to get it through there head that vaccines are good. It's like using a spoon to did out of prison

                                                                  • 신동범
                                                                    신동범  20 hours back

                                                                    like how do people actually believe vaccines are bad?

                                                                    • Kaata Furgenduter
                                                                      Kaata Furgenduter  17 hours back

                                                                      I agree. But if you're in the Philippines, I don't blame you if you can't trust the government. After all, The Philippines in one of the most, if not the most corrupt country in Asia.